If I was really to listen to gun control freaks and put a sign in my front yard that says “Gun-Free Zone” then according to them my house will be safest house on the block because being even remotely near guns or a beretta 9mm increases danger. No way Jose. Criminals ignore the law. That’s why they get labeled criminals. The only people who abide by “Gun Control” are law-abiding victims. That’s why every home and office with “Gun Control” becomes a “Victim Disarmament Zone.” All these studies show a dramatic decrease in violent crime when more private citizens are permitted to defend themselves on their terms, such as the country of Switzerland and all concealed carry states.
CONVERSELY, VIOLENT CRIME RISES IN DIRECT PROPORTION WITH THE NUMBER OF GUN-CONTROL LAWS AS SEEN IN ENGLAND, AUSTRALIA, AND ALL STATES WHERE 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS ARE CONSTANTLY DENIED LIKE CALIFORNIA, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, ETC. IF ONLY THEY HAD THEIR OWN BERETTA 9MM.
A long time ago there was uproar when a man in New Mexico was seen with a revolver on his hip near where Obama was golfing. He was just walking around, minding his own business (the guy with the gun, not the president). What the media failed to alert us is that Obama is surrounded with guns everywhere he goes. The message is: Guns are safe when the police have them, but they’re not safe when you have them. I didn’t need a permit, registration, fingerprinting, background check or state exam to exercise my 1st amendment right to write this article. Why do I need them to exercise my 2nd amendment rights? I just want to cradle my very own Beretta 9mm. This makes no sense.